Zurück zur Bibliothek

Employee goal quality check

Checks employee goals for clarity, measurable outcomes, dates, ownership, baseline, and alignment with the approved performance framework, then records rewrite suggestions and missing evidence. Use for goal-setting calibration, performance-cycle quality checks, or manager review preparation.

von adlass TemplatesVersion 1Nutzt adlass-ToolsUniversell

Veröffentlicht 21. Aug. 2026 · Aktualisiert 26. Aug. 2026

Hilfreich · 0Rohes SKILL.md ansehen

Voraussetzungen

Add the goal-writing rubric and current cycle calendar. Map goal and employee fields to the HR tables. Define alignment evidence and measurable-target rules. Set privacy and manager-access requirements.

Skill-Dokument

Das vollständige SKILL.md, das dein Agent liest und befolgt.

Employee goal quality check

Purpose

Find goals that cannot support a fair end-of-cycle assessment. The check tests whether each goal states an outcome, measurable evidence, a time boundary, an accountable owner, and a credible connection to team work.

Scope

Review active employee goals against the supplied goal rubric, role expectations, team priorities, and cycle dates. Classify defects and propose precise edits without changing the employee record.

Excluded: rating employee performance, ranking employees, deciding compensation, and inferring ability from poorly written goals.

Data basis

  • Goal table columns employee_id, goal_id, title, description, metric, baseline, target, due_date, owner, and status.
  • Role expectations, team priorities, and performance-cycle calendar.
  • Goal-writing rubric defining measurable, outcome, stretch, and dependency rules.
  • Prior-cycle goals and calibration notes where available.

Result

A goal-quality scorecard with one row per goal and a manager-facing correction memo.

Quality criteria

  • Every goal receives a pass or named defect for each rubric criterion.
  • A measurable target includes a unit, baseline or rationale, due date, and evidence source.
  • Alignment findings cite the relevant team priority or role expectation.
  • Suggested wording preserves the goal’s intent and never invents a target.
  • Employee identifiers are minimized in aggregate reporting.

Instructions

Apply the rubric in its published order. Distinguish a missing value from a weak value: not stated is not the same as not measurable. Treat shared work as valid only when the individual contribution and evidence owner are explicit. Flag dependencies separately from goal defects. Use the cycle calendar for due-date checks and do not create dates.

Adapt before use

  • Add the goal-writing rubric and current cycle calendar.
  • Map goal and employee fields to the HR tables.
  • Define alignment evidence and measurable-target rules.
  • Set privacy and manager-access requirements.

Verwandte Skills

  • 360 feedback synthesis

    Synthesizes 360-degree survey responses into privacy-safe competency scores, rater-group themes, self-versus-other gaps, and a focused coaching agenda. Use for multi-rater reviews, leadership development, performance feedback, anonymized comment analysis, and competency calibration.

  • Absence pattern report

    Reports absence frequency, lost days, and recurring patterns from attendance records without inferring medical causes, and produces a cited HR report with a data-quality register. Use for leave analysis, attendance trends, capacity planning, absence reporting, or workforce reviews.

  • Candidate Data Extraction

    Extracts consistent candidate fields from CVs into a review-ready matrix, preserving source wording and marking absent or ambiguous information rather than inferring it. Use for resume parsing, applicant data normalization, recruitment data entry, or candidate profile preparation.

  • Candidate Interview Debrief

    Consolidates interview-loop notes into a candidate scorecard and decision memo, preserving question-level evidence, interviewer ratings, disagreement, and missing signals. Use after panel interviews, structured interview debriefs, hiring reviews, or candidate evaluation meetings.