Back to library

Performance review evidence

Drafts an evidence-based performance review from goals, feedback, work results, competency anchors, and prior commitments, separating observations, ratings, and development actions. Use for annual reviews, manager preparation, calibration inputs, or performance documentation.

by adlass TemplatesVersion 1Uses adlass toolsUniversal

Published Aug 21, 2026 · Updated Aug 26, 2026

Helpful · 0View raw SKILL.md

Requirements

Add review template, rating scale, competency framework, and calibration guide. Map goals, results, feedback, project, employee, and development-plan fields. Define evidence standards, review period, attribution, and action-owner vocabulary.

Skill document

The full SKILL.md your agent reads and follows.

Performance review evidence

Purpose

Assemble a fair, cited performance review from objectives, results, feedback, competencies, and prior commitments while separating evidence from interpretation and rating.

Scope

Use employee profile, review period, goals, key results, project records, feedback entries, competency framework, prior review, development plan, and calibration definitions. Assess outcomes, behaviors, scope, quality, timeliness, and development progress.

Excluded: making employment decisions, inventing feedback, diagnosing performance, and changing HR records.

Data basis

  • Goal table with objective, metric, target, due date, result, status, and owner.
  • Project or work records, dated feedback, competency anchors, prior review, and development actions.
  • Rating scale, calibration guide, and review template.

Result

A review document with goal evidence, competency evidence, balanced examples, proposed rating rationale, strengths, development actions, and an evidence-gap section, plus an evidence index.

Quality criteria

  • Every material claim cites a dated goal, result, feedback entry, or work record.
  • Goal achievement compares target with result and states measurement unit.
  • Feedback is attributed and separated from verified outcome evidence.
  • Development actions have observable success measures and a review date when supplied.

Instructions

Assess the stated review period only unless prior commitments are explicitly used for continuity. Do not average incomparable goals or treat missing evidence as failure. Represent positive and corrective evidence for each competency where available. Apply the supplied rating scale; otherwise propose no rating and state the missing framework. Protect irrelevant personal information.

Use neutral language for evidence gaps and avoid converting a single anecdote into a pattern. Where sources disagree, present both dated accounts and defer the interpretation. Keep proposed development actions distinct from any formal rating consequence.

Adapt before use

  • Add review template, rating scale, competency framework, and calibration guide.
  • Map goals, results, feedback, project, employee, and development-plan fields.
  • Define evidence standards, review period, attribution rules, and action-owner vocabulary.

Related skills

  • 360 feedback synthesis

    Synthesizes 360-degree survey responses into privacy-safe competency scores, rater-group themes, self-versus-other gaps, and a focused coaching agenda. Use for multi-rater reviews, leadership development, performance feedback, anonymized comment analysis, and competency calibration.

  • Absence pattern report

    Reports absence frequency, lost days, and recurring patterns from attendance records without inferring medical causes, and produces a cited HR report with a data-quality register. Use for leave analysis, attendance trends, capacity planning, absence reporting, or workforce reviews.

  • Candidate Data Extraction

    Extracts consistent candidate fields from CVs into a review-ready matrix, preserving source wording and marking absent or ambiguous information rather than inferring it. Use for resume parsing, applicant data normalization, recruitment data entry, or candidate profile preparation.

  • Candidate Interview Debrief

    Consolidates interview-loop notes into a candidate scorecard and decision memo, preserving question-level evidence, interviewer ratings, disagreement, and missing signals. Use after panel interviews, structured interview debriefs, hiring reviews, or candidate evaluation meetings.