Pipeline hygiene review
Audits a sales pipeline for stale activity, invalid dates, missing stage evidence, incomplete fields, unusual amounts, and unsupported forecast positions. Use for pipeline hygiene, CRM cleanup, forecast preparation, sales operations review, or manager briefing.
Published Aug 21, 2026 · Updated Aug 26, 2026
Requirements
Add rules, thresholds, stage definitions and required fields. Map pipeline and activity columns.
Skill document
The full SKILL.md your agent reads and follows.
Pipeline hygiene review
Purpose
Find data and process conditions that make a pipeline unreliable, then provide evidence-backed correction suggestions. The review leaves source records untouched and distinguishes policy violations from informational anomalies.
Scope
Open opportunities, stages, dates, amounts, owners, activity history, required fields, stage exit evidence, forecast categories, and prior pipeline snapshots.
Excluded: editing CRM records, deleting deals, notifying owners, and inventing missing activity.
Data basis
- Current pipeline table and activity records.
- Stage definitions, hygiene rules, and required-field schema.
- Prior snapshot when available.
Result
A row-level findings sheet and a manager briefing with counts, trends, and correction priorities.
Quality criteria
- Every finding cites the rule and source row.
- Findings are reproducible from visible data.
- Stale, invalid, missing, and unusual conditions are distinct.
- Snapshot comparisons identify additions, removals, and changes.
- Findings do not imply deal quality beyond the rule tested.
Instructions
Apply configured thresholds exactly; never invent a day count or amount tolerance. Check stage evidence before judging forecast. Use prior snapshots only for comparable periods. Group related findings per deal while retaining one row per issue. Include clean records in the population count.
Adapt before use
Keep a clear audit trail throughout the run. Use the source wording and field values that support each material conclusion, and retain uncertainty when the evidence does not decide the issue. Separate a missing record from a negative result and a contradictory record from an exception. Prefer a short, prioritised result over unsupported completeness. Check that counts, identifiers, dates, and labels agree across the written result and the structured output. When a rule, source, or mapping is unavailable, name the limitation and explain how it affects interpretation. Do not silently infer ownership, approval, timing, or business intent.
- Add stage definitions, hygiene rules, required fields, and thresholds.
- Map pipeline and activity columns.
- Define the preferred severity and correction vocabulary.
Related skills
- Account growth plan
Builds a practical growth plan for an existing account from revenue, product usage, stakeholder, service, contract, and opportunity evidence. Use for key-account planning, expansion planning, whitespace analysis, relationship mapping, or strategic account reviews.
- Account news scan
Scans recent public developments about a target account and turns them into dated, sales-relevant talking points with citations. Use before a customer or prospect call for account news, business triggers, company updates, market signals, or timely meeting preparation.
- Account research brief
Builds an evidence-backed account research brief from CRM history, firmographic records, public company materials, and prior interactions, with buying signals, stakeholders, risks, and a ranked account plan. Use for strategic prospect research, account planning, territory reviews, named-account preparation, and enterprise sales research.
- Account technology landscape
Builds a cautious, source-backed view of the technologies and vendors an account publicly appears to use, with confidence, relevance, and research gaps. Use for account research, technology landscape review, prospect preparation, vendor context, or solution positioning.