Proposal assumption check
Audits a sales proposal for hidden assumptions, scope gaps, inconsistent promises, pricing mismatches, dependencies, and unsupported claims. Use before commercial review for proposal QA, quote review, scope validation, or deal risk reduction.
Published Aug 21, 2026 · Updated Aug 26, 2026
Requirements
Add approved proposal, pricing, claims and commercial rules. Define severity and mandatory-review criteria.
Skill document
The full SKILL.md your agent reads and follows.
Proposal assumption check
Purpose
Inspect a proposal against its requirements, approved commercial sources, and internal consistency so reviewers can resolve risks before a customer sees it.
Scope
Requirements coverage, scope, deliverables, dependencies, exclusions, dates, pricing, discounts, claims, service levels, customer responsibilities, and open approvals.
Excluded: rewriting the proposal, approving terms, sending it, or providing legal advice.
Data basis
- Proposal document supplied as a run input.
- Requirements, pricing policy, offer catalogue, and approved claims in scope.
Result
A finding sheet and decision memo with severity, citation, and correction suggestion.
Quality criteria
- Every finding cites proposal section and source rule.
- Arithmetic and repeated values reconcile.
- Missing requirements are recorded explicitly.
- Severity uses the configured vocabulary.
- No issue is introduced without evidence.
Instructions
Check material customer commitments before style. Distinguish contradiction, omission, unsupported claim, and review preference. Use approved thresholds and terms only. Quote decisive wording where a reviewer needs to locate the issue. Do not silently fix the source document.
Adapt before use
Keep a clear audit trail throughout the run. Use the source wording and field values that support each material conclusion, and retain uncertainty when the evidence does not decide the issue. Separate a missing record from a negative result and a contradictory record from an exception. Prefer a short, prioritised result over unsupported completeness. Check that counts, identifiers, dates, and labels agree across the written result and the structured output. When a rule, source, or mapping is unavailable, name the limitation and explain how it affects interpretation. Do not silently infer ownership, approval, timing, or business intent. Keep commercial risk separate from editorial preference.
- Add approved proposal template, claims, pricing and commercial rules.
- Define severity and mandatory-review criteria.
- Map required sections and customer requirements.
Related skills
- Account growth plan
Builds a practical growth plan for an existing account from revenue, product usage, stakeholder, service, contract, and opportunity evidence. Use for key-account planning, expansion planning, whitespace analysis, relationship mapping, or strategic account reviews.
- Account news scan
Scans recent public developments about a target account and turns them into dated, sales-relevant talking points with citations. Use before a customer or prospect call for account news, business triggers, company updates, market signals, or timely meeting preparation.
- Account research brief
Builds an evidence-backed account research brief from CRM history, firmographic records, public company materials, and prior interactions, with buying signals, stakeholders, risks, and a ranked account plan. Use for strategic prospect research, account planning, territory reviews, named-account preparation, and enterprise sales research.
- Account technology landscape
Builds a cautious, source-backed view of the technologies and vendors an account publicly appears to use, with confidence, relevance, and research gaps. Use for account research, technology landscape review, prospect preparation, vendor context, or solution positioning.