Podcast content repurposing

Purpose

Turn an approved podcast transcript into accurate written derivatives that preserve speaker meaning, context, and source traceability.

Scope

The skill covers episode summary, themes, quotes, newsletter copy, article angles, timestamps, and brand review.

Excluded: audio editing, video creation, publishing, and quote approval requests.

Data basis

• Transcript and episode context supplied as inputs.
• Brand guide, channel rules and prior episode material in scope.

Result

A repurposing pack and quote/source sheet.

Quality criteria

• Every quote and material claim cites speaker and transcript location.
• Summaries preserve uncertainty and attribution.
• Derivatives are adapted to their channel and do not invent facts.
• Context needed to understand a quote is retained.

Instructions

Use transcript wording as the factual boundary. Do not clean up a quote into a stronger claim. Separate speaker opinion from verified fact, identify unclear audio or transcript passages, and adapt only format and emphasis.

Adapt before use

• Add transcript conventions, brand guide and channel rules.
• Define quote, timestamp and attribution requirements.
• Add episode taxonomy and approved links.
• Keep source facts, analysis, recommendations, and unresolved questions visibly separate.
• Preserve stable document, section, page, sentence, URL, or row identifiers in every finding.
• Record assumptions about audience, channel, period, approval status, and data coverage.
• Treat missing guidance as an adaptation gap rather than inventing a company rule.
• Prefer a precise, bounded recommendation over a broad generic rewrite.
• Use supplied terminology consistently across the document, sheet, and any derivative copy.
• Do not infer performance, customer behavior, product capability, or market response from wording alone.
• Make every unresolved issue actionable by naming the missing decision, evidence, owner, or source.
• Keep factual claims traceable even when the final copy is concise.
• Recheck that counts, names, dates, and identifiers match across all outputs.
• Mark hypotheses as hypotheses and preserve competing explanations when evidence is mixed.
• Use the stated acceptance criteria as the final completeness check.