Supplier onboarding dossier
Reviews supplier onboarding information, validates required documents and risk facts, and produces a decision-ready dossier with conditions and missing evidence. Use for new supplier setup, procurement due diligence, vendor qualification, supplier approval, and third-party onboarding.
Veröffentlicht 21. Aug. 2026 · Aktualisiert 26. Aug. 2026
Voraussetzungen
Add onboarding checklist, risk criteria, and approval policy. Define validity, terminology, evidence, and escalation conventions. Set supplier ownership and decision roles.
Skill-Dokument
Das vollständige SKILL.md, das dein Agent liest und befolgt.
Supplier onboarding dossier
Purpose
Turn supplier questionnaires and supporting documents into a consistent qualification record. Expose missing, expired, inconsistent, or risk-sensitive information before a supplier decision is made.
Scope
Supplier profile, tax and payment details, insurance, certifications, ownership, service scope, risk criteria, and procurement requirements. Excluded: verifying bank accounts externally, approving suppliers, signing contracts, or contacting suppliers.
Data basis
- Supplier questionnaire and company profile.
- Certificates, insurance, banking, ownership, and compliance documents.
- Procurement requirements, risk criteria, and approval policy.
Result
A supplier dossier, document checklist, and conditional approval recommendation with every finding cited.
Quality criteria
- Each required document has present, missing, expired, or unclear status.
- Dates, names, and identifiers are compared across sources.
- Risk classification follows supplied criteria.
- Recommendations state conditions and unresolved evidence.
Instructions
Do not treat document presence as validity. Compare legal name, address, registration, and account identifiers across documents. Preserve conflicting values. Distinguish a procurement requirement from a legal conclusion. Use company risk criteria; otherwise label the assessment indicative.
The review should make the population, calculation basis, and exception treatment understandable to a second operator. Preserve source identifiers in every working table, and state the effect of missing evidence on the decision. A reviewer must be able to reproduce each material result from the cited rows, clauses, dates, or policy rules. Where two sources disagree, show both values and explain which source was treated as authoritative.
Use the outputs as review workpapers: retain the source locator beside every material value, and keep planned action separate from completed evidence. The final document must identify the consequence of each gap for the relevant operational or control decision.
Adapt before use
- Add onboarding checklist, risk criteria, and approval policy.
- Define required validity periods, terminology, and evidence citations.
- Set supplier ownership and escalation roles.
Verwandte Skills
- 8D problem-solving report
Builds a traceable 8D problem-solving report from a manufacturing complaint, defect record, and process evidence. Use for customer complaints, recurring production defects, containment records, corrective action reports, and structured root-cause investigations.
- Capacity resource plan
Converts demand forecasts, staffing calendars, work hours, absences, and throughput assumptions into a capacity plan with bottleneck dates and quantified staffing options. Use for workforce capacity planning, resource allocation, utilization review, and delivery-load analysis.
- Construction punch list
Converts inspection notes, photos, room data, and project requirements into a prioritized construction punch list with trade grouping and verification fields. Use for substantial completion, handover inspections, snagging, closeout walks, and defect follow-up.
- Construction RFI draft
Converts a construction field question or document conflict into a precise request for information with evidence, options, and schedule or cost implications. Use for RFIs, design clarifications, plan conflicts, specification gaps, and field coordination questions.